WELCOME

Among those of us who care deeply for and about people with developmental disabilities, I hope to hear emerge a new voice, ours, rising together for the benefit of all, harmonizing with reason, respect and hope, and transcending divisions, giving birth to a new era of creative cooperation.

Toward this potential, DD EXCHANGE is for conversation, civil sounding off, sharing of stories, experience, information, resources, and inspiration, giving and receiving support, and creative problem solving.


Finding Your Way Around

TO SEE OTHER'S INPUT: below each post on the right, click "links to this post;" or in the left side column, under "Labels," click the discussion link that interests you.

If there is no comment box below the post, click on
"# comments." It should open one.

TO CONTRIBUTE: add comments to posts in comment boxes &/or submit an article. Comments may also be sent for posting on your behalf. Email address as follows:

EMAIL: ddexchanges@gmail.com

MAILING LIST: add or remove name:
send request to email address, above.

WEB LINKS: to access other websites of interest, in the list to the right, just click on the underlined name.

FOLLOWERS: interested people, websites, organizations, businesses
who follow our discussions & choose to be public about their support.
Become a follower. Public support is a good thing!




Tuesday, March 22, 2016

ANSWERING BIASED READER COMMENT IN NOW DISABLED KING 5 COMMENT SECTION:

God Bless Maralyn Chase and Frank Chopp and all the other legislators who understand the need for and continue to vote for RHC survival. My non-verbal, sister, intellectual age-18 months, with severe spastic quadraplegia, major motor seizures and bi-polar disease thrives because her RHC home is still open. PT, OT, ST, nursing, medical, dental, dietary and well-managed, specially trained  attendants cooperate to provide care according to her individual, interdisciplinary team plan.  I am part of the team. Without the centralized services available on her RHC campus, her needs could not be met as she needs them to be. They are too intensive and complex.

Don't trust the cost comparisons cited by Susannah Frame. She is perpetuating myth, not quoting "science". When comparisons are made between RHCs and community-at-large costs, they are apples-to-oranges, inaccurate because: 1. No way to aggregate all the piece-meal therapies and services in the community-at-large has been devised. 2. DSHS only tracks the costs that accrue to it's budget. 3. Costs are included on the RHC side of the ledger that don't apply to the residents being compared, and in some cases, even to the RHCs: eg: utility costs for unrelated, campus property tenants who pay no rent but benefit from free utilities from the facility. 4. People who are promised services in the community-at-large if they agree to be moved from an RHC don't always get the services they had or were promised; this, of course, lowers their costs.

Before her RHC admission, my sister was terribly abused in her community-at-large home. Oversight that is  designed to PREVENT abuse is still needed in the community-at-large. Federal standards and audits to enforce them make the RHCs the safer option for people as vulnerable as my sister is. 
RHCs aren't appropriate for everyone. For some, they definitely are too restrictive. But for those who need them, their full service, therapeutic, residential communities meet their needs in ways that are impossible in the widespread, piece-meal services available in homes provided by businesses which, also, are tax supported,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are encouraged. By sharing perspective, personal experience, both positive & negative, ideas, resources and support, readers can enhance each others&; understanding and we will all benefit.